Performance Intelligence

KPI Library
+ Digital Architecture

Every KPI, measure, and threshold that powers The Actionable Insights — with tier, direction, and implementation guidance. Plus: how to connect from basic Excel to fully integrated digital systems.

Tier Key: T3 Site Headline T2 Operational Drill-Down T1 Line-Item Action ▲ Higher is better  ·  ▼ Lower is better
Tier KPI / Metric What You See at This Tier Data Elements / Dimensions UOM Exceeds Meets Partial Dir
People
T3
Training Completion Rate
% required training items completed in period
Site-level training completion vs. requirementsPeriod, dept, role, training type, completion flag%≥98%≥95%≥85%
T3
On-Time Training Completion
% training completed by required due date
Training on-time rate vs. due datesPeriod, dept, training type, due date vs. completion%≥98%≥95%≥85%
T2
Training Hours Per Employee
Total training hours / headcount in period
Avg training investment per employeePeriod, dept, training type, hourshrs≥4.5≥3.5≥2.5
T2
Training Pace
Completions to date vs. expected completions at this point in period
Training pace — on track vs. expected cadencePeriod, dept, expected vs. actual completions%≥110%≥90%≥75%
T1
Employees with No Due Items (<7 Days)
% employees current within 7-day window
% employees with no due/overdue items inside 7 days — suite / dept levelEmployee, training items, due dates, suite/dept%≥97%≥93%≥85%
T1
Training Compliance — By Employee
Individual compliance flag per employee per suite/role
Compliant / non-compliant by name, role, suite — actionable at line levelEmployee name, role, suite, item, due date, statusflagCompliantDue <7dOverdue
Safety — EHS
T3
TRIR
Total Recordable Incident Rate — recordable incidents × 200,000 / hrs worked
Site TRIR vs. target — pharma best-in-class <0.5Period, incident type, hours workedrate≤0.5≤1.0≤1.5
T3
Days Without Recordable Incident
Days since last OSHA recordable
Days since last OSHA recordable incidentSite, last incident date, current datedays≥365d≥180d≥120d
T3
EHS Compliance Risk Score
Composite: reg compliance 40% + audit closure 35% + open findings risk 25%
Composite compliance risk score — site levelRegulation, audit findings, open actionsscore≥95%≥85%≥75%
T2
Near Miss / Observation Count
Higher = stronger preventive reporting culture
Near miss and safety observation volume — dept levelPeriod, dept, category (near miss / observation)#≥200≥100≥50
T2
Safety CAPA On-Time Closure
% safety CAPAs closed on or before due date
Safety CAPA closure rate vs. due datesPeriod, CAPA owner, due date, closure date%≥95%≥85%≥75%
T1
Safety Issues Open — Suite Level
Count open actions where Owner = EHS as-of current day — from T1 PSQDC
Open EHS action items by suite — actionable at floor levelSuite, action, owner, due date, open countcount00≥1
T1
6S Compliance Rate
% 6S audit areas passing threshold — area level
6S audit pass rate by areaPeriod, area, audit score, pass/fail flag%≥95%≥90%≥80%
Quality
T3
Right First Time (RFT)
% batches released without deviation or rework
Batch quality rate — site levelPeriod, suite, product, deviation flag%≥97%≥93%≥87%
T3
CAPA On-Time Closure
% CAPAs closed on or before due date
CAPA closure rate vs. committed due dates — site levelPeriod, CAPA type, owner, due date vs. closure date%≥95%≥85%≥75%
T3
Deviation Rate
Deviations per batch — lower is better
Deviation frequency vs. batch volume — site levelPeriod, suite, product, deviation type, batch countper batch≤0.10≤0.20≤0.35
T2
OOX Rate (OOS / OOT)
% test results outside specification or trend limits
Out-of-spec and out-of-trend rate by product and testPeriod, product, test method, result vs. spec/trend%≤0.5%≤1.0%≤2.0%
T2
Batch Release Cycle Time
Days from batch completion to QA release — lower is better
Avg days from end of manufacturing to QA batch releaseProduct, batch #, completion date, release datedays≤14d≤21d≤30d
T2
Change Control On-Time
% change controls approved within target cycle time
Change control cycle time vs. target — by typePeriod, change type, owner, open date, approval date%≥95%≥85%≥75%
T2
Complaint Rate
Customer / product complaints per batch released
Complaint frequency vs. batches released — product levelPeriod, product, complaint category, batch countper batch≤0.02≤0.05≤0.10
T1
Days Without Deviation — Suite Level
Days since last deviation in suite — from T1 PSQDC
Days without DV by suite — actionable at floor levelSuite, last deviation date, current date, days elapseddays≥30d≥10d≥5d
T1
MPR Review OT + RFT %
% MPRs both on-time AND right-first-time — from T1 PSQDC
Manufacturing Package Review quality at batch/suite levelSuite, batch, MPR, on-time flag, RFT flag%≥97%≥93%≥87%
T1
MPR Real-Time Review Complete %
% MPRs with real-time review steps completed — from T1 PSQDC
MPR real-time review completion by suite and batchSuite, batch, MPR, RTR_Complete_Flag%≥100%≥95%≥90%
Delivery — Supply Chain, Manufacturing, Demand, Procurement, Warehousing & Shipment
T3
Perfect Shipment
OT + In-Full + Accuracy + Damage Free — all four pillars = 1
Composite delivery performance — site levelPeriod, client, shipment #, 4-pillar flags%≥97%≥93%≥85%
T3
On Time Delivery (Manufacturing)
% batches completed by planned end date
Batch completion vs. schedule — site levelPeriod, suite, product, planned vs. actual end date%≥97%≥92%≥85%
T3
Forecast Accuracy
1 − MAPE; higher = more accurate
Site % — plan vs. actual units shippedPeriod, product family, $ and unit variance%≥95%≥90%≥85%
T3
Schedule Adherence
% WOs completed on or before planned end date
Work order completion vs. planned dates — site levelPeriod, suite, product, planned vs. actual%≥95%≥90%≥80%
T3
MRP Adherence
% MRP actions (PO/WO/PR) executed on time
MRP execution discipline — site levelPeriod, action type (PO/WO/PR), on-time vs. late%≥95%≥90%≥80%
T3
RTE Index
Composite readiness — minimum of 7 milestone factors
Ready-to-Execute composite site readiness7 readiness milestones, min score%≥95%≥85%≥70%
T3
Book-to-Bill Ratio
Orders booked / billed; >1.0 = pipeline growing
Orders booked vs. billed — site levelCurrent quarter, rolling 12-month trend×≥1.1×≥1.0×≥0.9×
T3
Capacity Utilization
Secured + P75 demand / max capacity
% of site capacity committed to confirmed demandSuite / line, quarter, available headroom%≥85%≥70%≥50%
T3
Perfect Receipt
All 4 pillars: OT + In-Full + Correct PW + Damage Free
Composite receipt performance — site levelPeriod, supplier, 4-pillar breakdown%≥97%≥93%≥85%
T3
WO Fill Rate
% work orders filled on time and in full
Work order fill rate — site levelPeriod, product, WO #, on-time + in-full flags%≥98%≥95%≥88%
T3
Inventory MOS
Months of supply — target 10–14 month sweet spot
Current inventory coverage in monthsPeriod, product family, DOH calculationMO10–14 MO8–16 MO<8 or >20
T2
OEE
Availability × Performance × Quality
Overall Equipment Effectiveness — suite levelSuite, shift, Availability × Performance × Quality%≥83%≥70%≥55%
T2
Batch Cycle Time
Actual cycle time vs. target — lower is better
Avg days from batch start to releaseProduct, suite, batch #, start-to-release daysdays≤120d≤145d≤160d
T2
Secured Revenue vs. Plan
Confirmed backlog / quarterly plan
Confirmed backlog $ vs. quarterly planQuarter, product, client, gap to plan%≥105%≥95%≥85%
T2
On Time Shipment
% shipments delivered by commit date
Delivery vs. commit date — client levelClient, product, commit date vs. actual ship date%≥98%≥95%≥88%
T2
Order-to-Ship Cycle Time
Total days from order release to shipment departure
Avg days from order release to shipment departureClient, product, order date, ship datedays≤8d≤8d≤9d
T2
Dock-to-Stock Time
Total dock arrival to QA release — lower is better
Avg hours from dock arrival to QA-released inventoryPeriod, supplier, material, receive-to-release hourshrs≤36 hrs≤48 hrs≤72 hrs
T1
Schedule Adherence — Suite Level
Available hours / required hours from suite hourly schedule — from T1 PSQDC
Suite schedule adherence — actionable at floor levelSuite, shift, available hours, required hours%≥98%≥95%≥90%
T1
Ready to Execute — Suite Level
Count open actions with manufacturing impact = 1; 0 = Ready — from T1 PSQDC
Open manufacturing-blocking actions by suiteSuite, action, owner, manufacturing_impact flag, due datecount00≥1
T1
Win Strategy — Deal Detail
Full scope, value, competitive position, decision criteria per opportunity
Per-deal pipeline detail — actionable at BD/ops levelClient ID, project #, indication, dosage form, volumes, total contract $dealN/A — Qualitative
Cost / Financial
T3
Revenue vs. Plan
Actual revenue / budget target
Site revenue actuals vs. budget — period and YTDPeriod, product line, client, actuals vs. budget%≥105%≥98%≥90%
T3
EBITDA Margin
EBITDA / revenue — operating profitability
EBITDA % vs. target — site and consolidatedPeriod, P&L components, EBITDA vs. target%≥25%≥20%≥15%
T3
COGS as % of Revenue
Total COGS / net revenue — lower is better
COGS efficiency vs. budgetPeriod, product, COGS components vs. revenue%≤55%≤60%≤65%
T3
Strategic Goals Delivery
% strategic goals on track / completed vs. total
% strategic goals on track vs. annual planGoal, owner, status, % complete%≥90%≥80%≥70%
T3
CapEx Performance Index
Weighted composite: Schedule + Cost + Risk performance vs. plan
CapEx portfolio: % on budget, on schedule, at-riskProject, approved budget, actual spend, forecast at completion, variance%≥95%≥85%≥75%
T3
Initiatives Delivery
% active initiatives on time vs. total portfolio
% initiatives on time, at risk, completed, discontinuedInitiative, owner, planned end, status, value realization%≥90%≥80%≥70%
T2
Scrap as % of Sales
Total scrap USD / net revenue — lower is better
Scrap cost as % of revenuePeriod, product, scrap USD vs. net revenue%≤0.5%≤1.0%≤3.0%
T2
Spend Performance (Procurement)
Budget / actual spend — higher means under budget
Procurement spend vs. budgetPeriod, category, spend vs. budget%≤95%≤105%≤115%
T2
Savings as % of Sales
Realized savings / net revenue
Cost savings realized vs. revenuePeriod, initiative, savings $ vs. revenue%≥5.0%≥3.5%≥2.0%
T2
Value Realization Rate
Benefits delivered / benefits committed at initiation
Actual benefits realized vs. business case commitmentInitiative, benefit type, committed $, realized $%≥90%≥80%≥70%
T1
Equipment Downtime % — Suite Level
Downtime minutes / (required hours × 60) — from T1 PSQDC
Equipment downtime % by suite — actionable at floor levelSuite, downtime event, minutes, required hours%≤0.1%≤0.3%≤0.5%
T1
Overdue Issues — Suite Level
Count open actions past due date — from T1 PSQDC
Open overdue action items by suiteSuite, action, owner, due date, days overduecount00≥1
Innovation — NPI & Strategic Roadmap
T3
Pipeline Health
Composite: new opportunities, in execution, implementation rate
NPI pipeline health: new opps, in execution, implementedProgram, stage, probability, new / in-execution / implemented counts%≥80%≥65%≥50%
T3
NPI Success Rate
% NPI programs launched on time, right first time, and handed off successfully
NPI launch OT % + right first time % + handoff success %Program, launch date, RFT flag, handoff success flag%≥90%≥80%≥70%
T3
Vitality Index
Revenue from products launched in last 3 years / total revenue
Revenue % from products launched in last 3 yearsProduct, launch year, revenue contribution, total revenue%≥30%≥20%≥10%
T2
NPI Launch On Time
% NPI programs launched on or before planned date
NPI programs on time vs. planProgram, planned launch, actual launch, days variance%≥96%≥90%
T2
Value Realization (NPI)
Benefits delivered vs. business case within 12 months of launch
Benefits delivered vs. committed within 12 months post-launchProgram, committed benefit, realized benefit, realization %$≥Plan≥Plan
T2
Handoff Success Rate
% NPI programs with clean commercial handoff — no open items
Clean NPI-to-commercial handoff rateProgram, handoff date, open items count, escalations%≥97%≥90%
T1
Innovation Value Index
Weighted composite: Pipeline Health + NPI Success + Value Realization + Vitality Index
Single composite score for innovation performance vs. strategic roadmap4 component scores, weights, composite WPIscore≥90%≥75%≥60%
Digital Architecture
From field devices to executive analytics — a connected data and system architecture for regulated manufacturing
Analytics Layer
Enterprise Layer
Execution Layer
SCADA Control Layer
Data Analytics & Business Intelligence (Power BI / Tableau / AI Insights)
Data Lake / Data Warehouse
Data Integration Layer (API / ETL / iPaaS)
⬇ ⬆
Enterprise Layer
Enterprise Requirements Planning (ERP)
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
HR Management System (HRMS)
⬇ ⬆
Execution Layer
Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS)
Warehouse Management System (WMS)
Quality Management System (QMS)
EHS Management System (EHSMS)
Maintenance Management System (CMMS)
Electronic Logbooks & Batch Records
⬇ ⬆
SCADA Control Layer
Field Devices
Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs)
Data Acquisition / Visualization (SCADA / HMI)
Historian Database
📊 Level 1 — Excel / Flat File

Start with structured Excel imports. Dashboards can be built from weekly/monthly data exports with manual upload workflows — no integration required to get started.

🔗 Level 2 — API + Database Integration

Connect directly to ERP, LIMS, MES, and QMS via API or ODBC. Real-time or near-real-time KPI feeds with governed data definitions and automated refresh.

🤖 Level 3 — Fully Integrated + AI-Enabled

Full data lake integration with AI-supported insights, anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and automated escalation workflows built on the complete digital architecture above.

Digital Maturity Assessment
Where Are You Today? Where Should You Go Next?

The Actionable Insights can be deployed at any point on the digital maturity spectrum — from basic Excel imports to fully integrated SW applications. An assessment of the existing digital architecture identifies gaps, prioritizes integrations by value, and provides a phased implementation roadmap aligned to business priorities.

📁

Current State Mapping

Inventory all existing data sources, system connections, and manual processes. Identify which KPIs can be automated vs. manual.

🎯

Priority Integration Sequencing

Rank integrations by KPI coverage, data quality, and implementation effort. Build the business case for each integration step.

🗺️

Implementation Roadmap

Phased plan: quick wins (Excel/CSV), mid-term (API integrations), long-term (data lake + AI-enabled analytics).

AI + Digital Readiness
From Manual Reporting to Governed, Scalable, AI-Enabled Operations

AI readiness in performance intelligence is not primarily a technology question — it is a data governance, process discipline, and organizational readiness question. The maturity model below defines the four levels, what each looks like in practice, and what is required to advance to the next level.

Level 1

Manual Reporting

KPIs are tracked in spreadsheets. Data is manually compiled for reviews. Inconsistent definitions. No automated refresh. Insights require interpretation by data owners before each meeting.

Level 2

Structured Dashboards

Dashboards exist with defined KPIs, owned thresholds, and regular refresh — whether from Excel imports or live connections. Performance is visible. Escalation is defined but still manual.

Level 3

Governed Performance Intelligence

KPI architecture is governed: ownership, thresholds, escalation rules, action workflows. Tiered dashboards connect site → dept → individual. WPI scores enable cross-metric prioritization. Alerts trigger automatically.

Level 4

AI-Enabled Operations

AI-supported key takeaways, trend detection, anomaly flagging, and recommended actions are generated from live data. Predictive analytics anticipate performance risks. The dashboard conversation shifts from "what happened?" to "what should we do?"

DimensionLevel 1 — ManualLevel 2 — DashboardsLevel 3 — GovernedLevel 4 — AI-Enabled
Data SourceManual Excel entryExcel imports / flat filesLive API connectionsFull data lake + real-time streaming
KPI DefinitionVaries by ownerDefined per dashboardGoverned master KPI libraryGoverned + ML-enhanced definitions
Refresh CadenceWeekly / monthly manualWeekly / daily automatedDaily / near-real-timeReal-time with predictive projection
EscalationManager judgmentThreshold colors visibleAutomated alerts + owner assignmentPredictive escalation before threshold breach
AI CapabilityNoneNoneBasic trend + anomaly detectionKey takeaways, recommendations, natural language query
I²nnovate Entry Point✓ Start here✓ Most common start✓ Target state year 1–2✓ Target state year 2–3

Ready to Build Your KPI Intelligence System?

Start with an assessment of your current architecture and KPI maturity — or discuss connecting your first dashboard.

Assess KPI Maturity   Discuss Your Scope